<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Google, gimme back my widgets!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets</link>
	<description>An amateur's outlook on computation and mathematics.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moralism</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Moralism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys and Girls! Your problems are unimportant and booooooooooooring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys and Girls! Your problems are unimportant and booooooooooooring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>@Barry Cipra Nov 20: I've never seen anything like that. When you say "fade in," do you mean that in the cinematic sense--the objects gradually emerge from the background? Or is it just that they appear only after a delay? The latter could be the result of a slow server or a congested link somewhere on the network, but the former would have to be deliberately implemented.

In appearance, the main Google page is famously spare and simple, but when you look at the source code, there's quite a pile of stuff, including a few dozen scripts. The behavior of some of those scripts appears to depend on the date and time of day, on which browser you're using, on whether or not you've installed widgets like the Google toolbar and possibly on where you are.

I bet somebody has worked out just what all those scripts are up to, but at this point they're mysterioso to me. I do note a function named 'google.fx.easeInAndOut' which could well be doing fade ins and fade outs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Barry Cipra Nov 20: I&#8217;ve never seen anything like that. When you say &#8220;fade in,&#8221; do you mean that in the cinematic sense&#8211;the objects gradually emerge from the background? Or is it just that they appear only after a delay? The latter could be the result of a slow server or a congested link somewhere on the network, but the former would have to be deliberately implemented.</p>
<p>In appearance, the main Google page is famously spare and simple, but when you look at the source code, there&#8217;s quite a pile of stuff, including a few dozen scripts. The behavior of some of those scripts appears to depend on the date and time of day, on which browser you&#8217;re using, on whether or not you&#8217;ve installed widgets like the Google toolbar and possibly on where you are.</p>
<p>I bet somebody has worked out just what all those scripts are up to, but at this point they&#8217;re mysterioso to me. I do note a function named &#8216;google.fx.easeInAndOut&#8217; which could well be doing fade ins and fade outs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Cipra</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cipra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>I've noticed some other Google oddities lately.  For the last month or more, it occasionally happens that when I go to Google, all that shows up at first is the logo, search box, and widgets; the other stuff across the top of the page and below the widgets does a slow fade in.  And recently they sometimes don't fade in until I move the cursor across the screen.  About a week ago, I also saw a curious message just below the widgets, which faded away as the usual stuff faded in.  The message said "This line intentionally left blank."  (I may have the wording slightly wrong, but it was something close to that -- the sort of thing you see on official multi-page documents when they leave a page otherwise empty.)  Finally, just this morning, Google opened with just the logo, the search box, and a line below the box saying something like "Press Enter to search" -- i.e., no widgets at all!  (I'm sorry, I'm again not certain of the exact wording.  When I refreshed the screen I got the usual widgets.)

I doubt there's any real mystery in any of this.  But I thought some bit-player viewers might find these sightings amusing.  I'm reminded of Yogi Berra's famous remark, you can observe a lot by watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed some other Google oddities lately.  For the last month or more, it occasionally happens that when I go to Google, all that shows up at first is the logo, search box, and widgets; the other stuff across the top of the page and below the widgets does a slow fade in.  And recently they sometimes don&#8217;t fade in until I move the cursor across the screen.  About a week ago, I also saw a curious message just below the widgets, which faded away as the usual stuff faded in.  The message said &#8220;This line intentionally left blank.&#8221;  (I may have the wording slightly wrong, but it was something close to that &#8212; the sort of thing you see on official multi-page documents when they leave a page otherwise empty.)  Finally, just this morning, Google opened with just the logo, the search box, and a line below the box saying something like &#8220;Press Enter to search&#8221; &#8212; i.e., no widgets at all!  (I&#8217;m sorry, I&#8217;m again not certain of the exact wording.  When I refreshed the screen I got the usual widgets.)</p>
<p>I doubt there&#8217;s any real mystery in any of this.  But I thought some bit-player viewers might find these sightings amusing.  I&#8217;m reminded of Yogi Berra&#8217;s famous remark, you can observe a lot by watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>Google is maintaining another homepage that is exactly the same as google.com, so far as I can tell, except it has the plain logo and the old-style buttons.  http://www.freeholidaywifi.com/search/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is maintaining another homepage that is exactly the same as google.com, so far as I can tell, except it has the plain logo and the old-style buttons.  <a href="http://www.freeholidaywifi.com/search/" rel="nofollow">http://www.freeholidaywifi.com/search/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Cipra</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2233</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cipra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2233</guid>
		<description>A curious observation.  I have a 5-year-old iBook, which I still occasionally fire up and use.  I did so today and saw something odd when I went to Google:  Your lost, lamented jelly-bean widgets!

If it's of any value in pursuing the mystery, I was using Safari 1.3.2 on OS 10.3.9 (Panther? Puma? Alley Cat?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A curious observation.  I have a 5-year-old iBook, which I still occasionally fire up and use.  I did so today and saw something odd when I went to Google:  Your lost, lamented jelly-bean widgets!</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s of any value in pursuing the mystery, I was using Safari 1.3.2 on OS 10.3.9 (Panther? Puma? Alley Cat?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I. J. Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>I. J. Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>Your complaints make this sound like its Google's fault. I don't think it is. They tried to improve their page by increasing the size of the most important elements, a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Unless Google added some invalid CSS, it's the software on the Mac that failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your complaints make this sound like its Google&#8217;s fault. I don&#8217;t think it is. They tried to improve their page by increasing the size of the most important elements, a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Unless Google added some invalid CSS, it&#8217;s the software on the Mac that failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>"it makes our clean, minimalist homepage even easier and more fun to use."

I just tried a search with the new page and using it was exactly as much fun as it's ever been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it makes our clean, minimalist homepage even easier and more fun to use.&#8221;</p>
<p>I just tried a search with the new page and using it was exactly as much fun as it&#8217;s ever been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer to Stylish. Very handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer to Stylish. Very handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvind Narayanan</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvind Narayanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>You should consider installing the &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108" rel="nofollow"&gt;Stylish&lt;/a&gt; extension for Firefox. I am opinionated about UI and I the stylesheets on half the sites I visit (especially Google) make my eyes hurt. Stylish is basically a management interface for  userContent.css.. you can make your own edits or install any of hundreds of site-specific customizations available at userstyles.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should consider installing the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108" rel="nofollow">Stylish</a> extension for Firefox. I am opinionated about UI and I the stylesheets on half the sites I visit (especially Google) make my eyes hurt. Stylish is basically a management interface for  userContent.css.. you can make your own edits or install any of hundreds of site-specific customizations available at userstyles.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I read in braille</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>I read in braille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Apple users hate accessibility? Obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple users hate accessibility? Obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry N. Hurt</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry N. Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>I noticed this very thing, and it also upsets me.  Fie, fie on you, Google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this very thing, and it also upsets me.  Fie, fie on you, Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://bit-player.org/2009/hey-google-gimme-back-my-widgets#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-player.org/?p=451#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>Wow, is that ugly (also on Safari).  I never go to the Google home page, though, so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, is that ugly (also on Safari).  I never go to the Google home page, though, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

